Our Blog
Our Team is dedicated to reading the current medical and scientific literature regarding LASIK and update this
information on this web page. It is our commitment to staying current on LASIK research and educate our
patients.
January 3, 2014
Dry
Eyes After LASIK: Microkeratome versus Intralase
Although this is an older research paper, it is an important one and it answers a question patients commonly ask,
"which LASIK technology is the best?" It
is our opinion at the Orange County LASIK Institute that the use
of the Intralase femtosecond laser to make the corneal flap offers our patients
significant benefits over the use of the microkeratome (blade). The Intralase laser allows the surgeon to
produce a more precise corneal flap, have more customizable options during
surgery and creates a smoother corneal flap to allow for optimal results and
fewer complications. In addition to these previously known advantages of the
Intralase laser, there was a published 2009 study by the American Society of
Cataract and Refractive Surgery that determined that all-laser LASIK resulted
in less dry eye complications in patients when compared to those who had bladed
LASIK.
Researchers
at the Cole Eye Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, investigated the difference in
clinically significant dryness in patients who received all-laser LASIK versus
those who had bladed LASIK. They found
that patients who had bladed LASIK had more symptoms of dryness than those who
had all-laser LASIK. Additionally,
patients who underwent bladed LASIK were more likely to need treatment with
prescription Restasis eye drops for the management of dry eye symptoms that
were not satisfactorily relieved with the use of artificial tears alone. Researchers hypothesize that the
decreased
incidence of LASIK induced dry eye within the all-laser group was likely
attributed to the thinner, more precise corneal flaps the laser was able to
produce which resulted in less damage to corneal nerves.
Salomão,
Marcella Q., Renato Ambrósio, and Steven E. Wilson. "Dry Eye Associated
with Laser in Situ Keratomileusis: Mechanical Microkeratome versus Femtosecond
Laser." Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 35.10 (2009):
1756-760. Print.
The information is from the review of research and
literature by the Orange County LASIK Institute doctors and presents their opinion of the available
research up to date.
It does not mean to take the part of the informed consent with a doctor
and is used as an educational aide. This
is not meant to imply superiority or inferiority of a laser system and each
surgeon will have different results/skills with each laser system. It is meant to be a summary of one
practice opinions based on review of the literature. Effort has been made to cite the original research paper
and source of research.
© All content written and copyrighted by the San Diego LASIK Institute